Your benchmark is set across every attributed patient, but your member practices run care their own way. We give the whole network one between-visit program, and the fee-for-service codes it bills help pay for it.
ACO REACH ends on December 31, 2026. CMS’s successor, the LEAD model, starts January 1, 2027 and runs through 2036, with fixed benchmarks and two risk tracks.
MSSP has 511 ACOs participating in 2026.
The models keep changing.
Whichever track you’re on, savings come from the same place: patients with chronic conditions who don’t end up in the ED, and quality measures that are closed during the year instead of chased in the fourth quarter.
In our experience the ACOs that do well on those numbers aren’t the ones with the best dashboards; they’re the ones where someone actually calls a patient with a blood pressure of 162 over 98 in the same week the reading comes in, and gets the medication changed before the next quarterly visit.
One practice has a care manager, another has none. Your results depend on the weakest site, and you don’t control its staffing.
Most ACOs already know who their rising-risk patients are. The gap is someone contacting them every month.
Shared savings arrive a year or more after the work. Practices need the program to pay its way before reconciliation.
Blood pressure control and diabetes measures get chased at year end, when there’s little time left to change the reading.
Each program is reimbursed by Medicare fee-for-service to the member practice that bills it, and each one targets a cost or quality lever your contract is scored on.
Continuous blood pressure, glucose and weight data for the conditions that drive admissions and quality scores.
CPT 99453, 99454, 99457, 99458
A monthly primary care bundle with no time thresholds, which suits practices already organized around a care team.
HCPCS G0556, G0557, G0558
Contact within two business days of discharge, medication reconciliation and a timely follow-up visit.
CPT 99495, 99496
| What your contract is scored on | Program that moves it | How |
|---|---|---|
| Controlling high blood pressure | RPM | Readings between visits, medication changes made sooner |
| Diabetes control | RPM + CCM | Glucose trends plus monthly care-plan follow-up |
| All-cause readmissions | TCM + RPM | Contact in 2 business days, home monitoring for 30 days |
| Total cost of care | CCM / APCM for rising risk | Monthly contact before patients become high-cost |
| Patient experience | All programs | A named care team that calls every month |
ACO REACH and LEAD dates from CMS’s LEAD announcement as reported by Healthcare Dive and TechTarget; MSSP participation from CMS’s 2026 program figures as reported by Fierce Healthcare. HealthArc isn’t an ACO and doesn’t take risk; we run the care management your participants deliver.
The ACO sets the protocols. Each member practice keeps its own billing and NPI. Our clinical team fills the gaps where a practice can’t staff the work.
Start with the rising-risk tier. The top 5% is usually already managed. The next 15% is where monthly contact changes the cost curve.
Questions from ACO executives, medical directors and MSO operators, with plain answers.
| The question | Our answer |
|---|---|
| Are you an ACO enablement company? | We’re an execution partner. We don’t take risk or share savings. We run RPM and care management across your network. |
| Can different member practices use different EHRs? | Yes. Each practice connects its own EHR, and the ACO sees one network view on our platform. |
| Who gets the fee-for-service revenue? | The member practice that bills the code. Many ACOs use that revenue to fund the program at the practice level. |
| Does this work in MSSP and ACO REACH? | Yes, and in LEAD from 2027. The care management work is the same whichever model you’re in. |
| Can you report on our quality measures? | We report blood pressure control, diabetes indicators, readmissions and enrollment by attributed patient and practice. |
| How fast can we roll out? | The first practices are typically live in about 30 days, then we add sites in waves. |
Pilot with a few member practices, prove the numbers, then roll out across the network.
We use your attribution file to find rising-risk patients with hypertension, diabetes or heart failure, then pick the pilot practices.
Your medical director signs off on thresholds and escalation paths. Each pilot practice connects its EHR.
Our team enrolls patients under each practice’s name and ships activated cellular devices.
Monthly network reporting on quality gaps, utilization and revenue, then the next wave of practices.
What ACOs and value-based groups ask us most when they start evaluating care management partners.
Share a de-identified attribution summary. We’ll show the eligible cohort, the FFS revenue it would generate and the measures it would move.
Want a demo, or just have a question about remote care in your practice? Send us a few details and a remote care specialist will get back to you shortly.
No commitment required.
No obligation | No spam
Care management, quality measures and payment models for ACOs and risk-bearing groups.
A measure-by-measure map of what RPM, CCM and APCM can actually influence, the CBP specification detail most programs miss, and why PDC targeting should start at 79%.
Read articleCan you refuse a Medicare wellness visit? Yes — here are your rights, what the visit covers, whether it is required, and the risks of skipping it.
Read articleHealthArc vs Cadence compared on care model, programs, devices, EHR integration and CMS 2027 readiness, for practices, health systems and enterprise teams.
Read article