Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) has become a cornerstone of modern healthcare delivery. As providers shift toward value-based care, virtual care models, and chronic disease management, RPM companies are enabling healthcare organizations to monitor patients beyond the four walls of hospitals and clinics.
Remote patient monitoring companies use connected medical devices, software platforms, and clinical workflows to continuously collect patient health data—such as blood pressure, glucose levels, heart rate, weight, oxygen saturation, and temperature—and transmit it securely to care teams for timely intervention.
In this article, we explore the top 11 remote patient monitoring companies you must know in 2026, starting with HealthArc, a leading RPM company purpose-built for scalable, compliant, and revenue-generating RPM programs.
Table of Contents
ToggleHealthArc ranks #1 among remote patient monitoring companies due to its end-to-end RPM platform, deep device ecosystem, AI-enabled workflows, and flexible deployment model. Unlike vendors that focus only on devices or software, HealthArc delivers a complete RPM infrastructure that supports healthcare providers, payers, and digital health organizations at scale.
HealthArc is designed for organizations that want more than basic vitals collection. Its platform supports continuous remote health monitoring, proactive care management, automated documentation, and reimbursement optimization—all within a single, unified system.
Comprehensive RPM Platform
HealthArc brings together:
This holistic approach enables providers to operationalize RPM without stitching together multiple vendors.
HealthArc supports 40+ FDA-cleared RPM devices, including:
This flexibility allows providers to design RPM programs tailored to chronic conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, CHF, COPD, and obesity.
HealthArc uses AI and rules-based automation to:
This makes HealthArc especially effective for high-volume RPM programs.
HealthArc supports:
Providers can expand beyond RPM while using the same infrastructure.
HealthArc simplifies RPM reimbursement with:
This makes it one of the most revenue-optimized remote patient monitoring companies in the market.
HealthArc offers:
This flexibility makes it suitable for startups, health systems, and enterprise organizations alike.
HealthArc combines technology, clinical intelligence, device interoperability, and operational scalability—making it the most complete remote patient monitoring company available today.
Medtronic is one of the most established names among RPM companies, particularly in cardiac and chronic disease monitoring. Its RPM capabilities are tightly integrated with its medical devices, making it a strong option for device-centric care models.
Key Strengths
Limitations
Medtronic is best suited for organizations already invested in its device portfolio.
Philips Healthcare offers enterprise-grade remote patient monitoring through its HealthSuite platform. It is widely used by large hospitals and health systems for post-acute care and chronic disease management.
Key Strengths
Limitations
Philips Healthcare is ideal for large organizations seeking a robust remote health monitoring company with enterprise capabilities.
GE HealthCare provides RPM solutions that integrate closely with hospital systems, diagnostics, and imaging infrastructure.
Key Strengths
Limitations
GE HealthCare works best for health systems extending inpatient monitoring into home-based care.
Teladoc Health combines RPM with telehealth services, making it a strong option for organizations looking to blend virtual visits with continuous monitoring.
Key Strengths
Limitations
Teladoc Health is well-suited for organizations prioritizing virtual care ecosystems.
Accuhealth is known for its cellular-enabled remote patient monitoring, which removes barriers related to Wi-Fi and smartphone access.
Key Strengths
Limitations
Accuhealth is a strong choice for practices serving elderly or rural populations.
Athelas combines point-of-care testing devices with RPM software, enabling frequent health data capture.
Key Strengths
Limitations
Athelas fits clinics focused on frequent testing and rapid data access.
HealthSnap offers an integrated RPM and CCM platform with strong automation and billing support.
Key Strengths
Limitations
HealthSnap is a good option for practices launching RPM and CCM together.
CareSimple specializes in remote patient monitoring for seniors and post-acute care populations.
Key Strengths
Limitations
100Plus focuses on improving patient engagement in chronic care programs through RPM.
Key Strengths
Limitations
100Plus is suitable for chronic care RPM programs with engagement as a priority.
Separate from enterprise Philips Healthcare, Philips’ consumer health devices are often used in RPM programs due to their reliability and widespread adoption.
Key Strengths
Limitations
These devices are often paired with platforms like HealthArc for full RPM delivery.
When evaluating remote patient monitoring companies, consider:
Among all top 11 remote patient monitoring companies, HealthArc stands out by delivering:
For healthcare organizations looking to launch or scale RPM programs efficiently, HealthArc represents the most complete and future-ready remote patient monitoring company.
HealthArc, HealthSnap, and HRS are among the top RPM platforms, but the best choice depends on your practice size and needs.
They automate billing for CPT codes, integrate documentation, and reduce claim denials, improving revenue cycle efficiency.
Most leading companies (HealthArc, HealthSnap, Accuhealth, HRS) support HL7/FHIR integration with 50+ EHRs.
Look for real-time monitoring, EHR integration, billing support, patient engagement tools, and compliance readiness.
AI-driven vendors like GYANT and Binah.ai focus on automation, predictive insights, and virtual triage, reducing provider workload and improving patient outcomes.
There has always been a lot of data in healthcare. The challenge...
Learn MoreAs per various studies and well documented reports on managing chronic illnesses...
Learn MoreThe U.S. healthcare system continues its transition from fee-for-service models to value-based...
Learn More