HealthSnap alternative & migration
The provider-owned HealthSnap alternative
Trusted by 2,000+ providers across 45+ states
Looking to move off HealthSnap — or comparing it before you commit? HealthArc is device-agnostic, runs nine CMS programs on one login, and offers a provider-owned, own-staff model built for the proposed CMS 2027 rule. We migrate your patients, devices and billing with no monitoring gap.
Zero-gap cutover Keep your devices 2027-ready model
Currently on HealthSnapHealthArc
- Patient roster & panelMigrated
- Device inventoryMigrated
- Consents & reading historyMigrated
- Billing & CPT recordsMigrated
Live in ~30 days · no monitoring gap
Keep your devicesDevice-agnostic
Own your program2027-ready
2,000+Providers served
45+States covered
100,000+Patients monitored
9CMS programs, one platform
The short version
HealthArc vs HealthSnap
Our take
HealthSnap is a strong enterprise virtual-care platform, but it is built around a managed clinical-services model — the exact arrangement the proposed CMS 2027 rule would restrict. HealthArc gives you the same integrated RPM + CCM data on a platform you own, plus seven more reimbursable programs, device freedom, and a fixed ~30-day switch.
If you want to bring monitoring in-house, keep the hardware you already deployed, and stack more than RPM and CCM, HealthArc is the more future-proof home for your program.
Switch to HealthArc if…
- You want an own-staff / provider-owned model ahead of the proposed 2027 rule
- You need more than RPM + CCM on one platform
- You want to avoid a heavy enterprise implementation
- You want device freedom instead of a fixed program
Fair comparison
What is HealthSnap?
HealthSnap is a Miami-based virtual care management platform that unifies remote patient monitoring and chronic care management in a single system and pairs it with clinical monitoring services. It is aimed largely at health systems and larger provider organizations that want an integrated data layer and analytics across their care-management programs.
Where HealthSnap is strong is the enterprise story: a unified RPM + CCM record, reporting for large organizations, and the option to lean on its managed clinical staffing so an organization does not have to run the day-to-day monitoring itself.
Best suited for
Large health systems that want an integrated RPM + CCM platform with managed clinical services and are comfortable with an enterprise-scale rollout.
Why providers switch
Why practices move from HealthSnap to HealthArc
The structural reasons providers leave — and what HealthArc does differently.
Own your program for 2027
HealthSnap’s managed monitoring is exactly the third-party arrangement the proposed CY2027 rule would restrict. HealthArc offers a provider-owned, own-staff model so your reimbursement doesn’t hinge on a vendor’s clinical team.
Nine programs, not two
HealthSnap centers on RPM and CCM. HealthArc runs RPM, RTM, CCM, TCM, PCM, BHI, APCM, MTM, PIN on one login, so you can stack reimbursement instead of adding point tools.
Device freedom
HealthArc is device-agnostic across 40+ connected devices — keep compatible hardware you already deployed rather than standardizing on one program.
Right-sized onboarding
Skip a heavy enterprise implementation. Most practices are live on HealthArc in about 30 days with no IT team required, and we plan the switch around your renewal date.
The 2027 factor
HealthSnap and the proposed CMS 2027 rule
Model exposureHigh exposure
HealthSnap’s managed clinical-services model leans on staff who are not employed by the billing practice. The proposed CY2027 Physician Fee Schedule would only count RPM/RTM clinical-staff time performed by staff directly employed by the billing practice — so programs that depend on a vendor’s monitoring team are the most exposed to a reimbursement change. This is a proposed rule with an open comment period, not final policy; HealthArc’s provider-owned option lets you build the program on your own staff now, either way it lands.
Proposed rule
These are proposals in the CY2027 Physician Fee Schedule, not final policy — the public comment period is open and the final rule is expected later in 2026. Read our full CMS 2027 breakdown →
Head to head
HealthArc vs HealthSnap, side by side
| Capability | HealthArc | HealthSnap |
|---|---|---|
| Programs on one platform | RPM, RTM, CCM, TCM, PCM, BHI, APCM, MTM, PIN | Primarily RPM + CCM |
| Device choice | Device-agnostic · 40+ devices · keep yours | Connected-device program |
| Monitoring model | SaaS, co-managed or managed — provider-owned option | Managed clinical-services oriented |
| Proposed CY2027 readiness | Own-staff / provider-owned model available | Managed-staffing model more exposed |
| Best-fit customer | Practices & systems of any size | Enterprise / health systems |
| Time to launch | ~30 days · no IT team required | Enterprise implementation |
| Billing | Automated CPT tracking · audit-ready records | Included |
| Migration support | White-glove data, device & billing migration | Varies by contract |
The switch
Migrating from HealthSnap is easier than staying
Moving from HealthSnap to HealthArc is a white-glove, zero-gap switch. Your unified RPM + CCM history, patient roster, consents and billing records come with you, and patients keep transmitting throughout.
1
Free migration assessment
We review your current vendor, contract timing, device inventory and patient panel, then map a switch plan and revenue projection — no cost, no commitment.
2
Data & device mapping
We export and map your patient roster, historical readings, consents and billing history, and confirm which of your existing devices carry over.
3
Zero-gap cutover
Patients keep transmitting throughout the transition. Batch re-consent and EHR (HL7 FHIR) integration are handled in parallel — no monitoring gap.
4
Go-live & billing continuity
Your team trains in a few hours, enrollment moves over, and CMS-aligned billing documentation continues without interrupting cash flow.
FAQ
HealthSnap vs HealthArc, answered
Is HealthArc a good alternative to HealthSnap?
Yes — especially if you want to own your monitoring rather than rely on managed clinical services. HealthArc matches HealthSnap’s integrated RPM + CCM approach, adds seven more reimbursable programs on one login, is device-agnostic, and offers a provider-owned model designed for the proposed CMS 2027 rule.
Can I migrate from HealthSnap to HealthArc without losing data?
Yes. Our white-glove migration exports and maps your patient roster, historical device readings, care plans, consents and billing history into HealthArc via a structured HL7 FHIR import, so your clinical and billing continuity is preserved.
How does the proposed CMS 2027 rule affect HealthSnap users?
The CY2027 proposed rule would only count RPM/RTM clinical-staff time performed by staff employed by the billing practice, which puts managed and outsourced monitoring reimbursement at risk. It is a proposal with an open comment period, not final. Because HealthSnap’s model is oriented around managed services, moving to a provider-owned model is worth planning now.
Do I have to change devices to switch from HealthSnap?
Usually not. HealthArc supports 40+ connected devices and is device-agnostic, so compatible hardware you already deployed typically keeps working. We confirm device carry-over during your free migration assessment.
How long does it take to switch from HealthSnap to HealthArc?
Most practices are live within about 30 days with no IT team required, and we plan the timeline around your HealthSnap renewal date so there’s no overlap or wasted spend.
Keep comparing
Other RPM alternatives
Comparing more than HealthSnap? Explore every platform we stack up against — pick a vendor for a side-by-side and a migration plan.
Ready to leave HealthSnap behind?
See how HealthArc compares to HealthSnap on your own numbers — and get a free, no-commitment migration plan and revenue projection on a single call.
Comparison based on publicly available information about HealthSnap as of 2026 and HealthArc’s own capabilities; vendor features and pricing change over time — verify current details with each vendor. HealthSnap is a trademark of its respective owner and is referenced here for comparison purposes only. CMS CY2027 references describe a proposed rule that is not final.